On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 11:08 AM, maskkkk132 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> What they really mean: "We don't want to spend the money" > > No I don't think that's it, like I said they already have a copy of VS > 2005. They are really afraid of type-safety.
Hmmmm... curious to see what they mean by that.. Visual C++ 97 is even older than VC++ 6.0, which is known to have issues and isn't standards compliant. I'd think if they were concerned about "type safety" they'd want a compiler that was more current and compliant. -- Brett ------------------------------------------------------------ "In the rhythm of music a secret is hidden; If I were to divulge it, it would overturn the world." -- Jelaleddin Rumi
