On 11/27/06, Henning Thielemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, 25 Nov 2006, Isaac Jones wrote: > I anticipate some objections, because some people _hate_ .lhs, but we > can see how it goes; in that case, they could always use the > user-supplied field to tell cabal layered tools to use the > Setup.Foo.Hs or whatever the user wants. What about a separate binary, say 'cabal-setup', that calls runhaskell Setup.hs ?
Isn't that essentially what 'cabal-setup' is doing now? -- Cheers, Lemmih _______________________________________________ cabal-devel mailing list cabal-devel@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cabal-devel
