Lemmih <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 11/27/06, Henning Thielemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> On Sat, 25 Nov 2006, Isaac Jones wrote: >> >> > I anticipate some objections, because some people _hate_ .lhs, but we >> > can see how it goes; in that case, they could always use the >> > user-supplied field to tell cabal layered tools to use the >> > Setup.Foo.Hs or whatever the user wants. >> >> What about a separate binary, say 'cabal-setup', that calls >> runhaskell Setup.hs >> ? > > Isn't that essentially what 'cabal-setup' is doing now?
cabal-setup is doing that and more, yes. peace, isaac _______________________________________________ cabal-devel mailing list cabal-devel@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cabal-devel
