On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 20:41 -0700, Stefan O'Rear wrote: > A large number of the newer GHC extensions have no cabal name. This > is a very bad situation because if Hugs/yhc/etc were to gain support > for (say) GADTs, it would not be possible to run cabal programs that > require them, since the way programs specify dependency is with > -fglasgow-exts. Also, what is the protocol for requesting cabal > extension names?
You could do worse than to make up a sensible name and darcs send in your patch to the Language.Haskell.Extension module to this list. Duncan _______________________________________________ cabal-devel mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cabal-devel
