On Sat, Mar 31, 2007 at 04:10:27PM +1000, Duncan Coutts wrote: > On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 20:41 -0700, Stefan O'Rear wrote: > > A large number of the newer GHC extensions have no cabal name. This > > is a very bad situation because if Hugs/yhc/etc were to gain support > > for (say) GADTs, it would not be possible to run cabal programs that > > require them, since the way programs specify dependency is with > > -fglasgow-exts. Also, what is the protocol for requesting cabal > > extension names? > > You could do worse than to make up a sensible name and darcs send in > your patch to the Language.Haskell.Extension module to this list. > > Duncan
I'll take that as permission :) Stefan _______________________________________________ cabal-devel mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cabal-devel
