On 25 October 2011 10:48, Tillmann Rendel <ren...@informatik.uni-marburg.de> wrote: > I see many good reasons for both naming conventions and explicit > configuration. I just wonder whether it is a good idea to switch from one to > the other in the middle of Cabal's success story.
I see your point. I just remembered I proposed this myself in the ticket about this: http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/hackage/ticket/619 So I'm fine with adding it to the cabal file. I may even do this myself but I'm a bit swamped at the moment. Any ideas about my second point in the ticket: "Should there be a restriction on the logo width and height? Maybe we need support for multiple sized logo's: a big one to put on the hackage page and a small one to display in package lists. (Maybe we even need support for favicons)" Currently the only restriction on the logo is that it should be either a .svg or .png (or both but svg is preferred). There aren't any restrictions on dimensions. However the logo is shown with a height of 200px. Bas _______________________________________________ cabal-devel mailing list cabal-devel@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cabal-devel
