I still think we shouldn't change the CompilerId type. You gave this motivation for changing it in another thread:
> It's not so much an implementation detail of GHCJS itself, but more a side > effect of many people using impl(ghc) flags in their packages to check > whether the compiler supports some particular feature. We could leave it out, > but then many packages would have to be updated to duplicate the impl check > (or replace it) I think we should definitely fix the packages, not put a hack in Cabal. On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 2:25 AM, Luite Stegeman <stege...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 5:08 AM, Carter Schonwald > <carter.schonw...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Just so you guy's know, Luite should have a patch ready for consideration >> very soon. (just spoke with him) > > > Yes, I've updated the patch [1], but I still have a problem loading dynlibs > for TH in some cases. I don't think it's related to Cabal (which appears to > be running all the right commands), but I can't completely rule it out > either. > > luite > > [1] > https://github.com/ghcjs/cabal/commit/ce3c18aedbc4fbf58b150f10690aa5dca6ab0d72 _______________________________________________ cabal-devel mailing list cabal-devel@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cabal-devel
