> I think we should definitely fix the packages, not put a hack in Cabal.
In the latest hackage archive, there are 462 packages that use the impl(ghc) flag, including lots of very common packages. For example binary: if impl(ghc >= 7.2.1) cpp-options: -DGENERICS other-modules: Data.Binary.Generic if impl(ghc <= 7.6) -- prior to ghc-7.4 generics lived in ghc-prim build-depends: ghc-prim Is there a generic way to do this without impl ghc checks? Otherwise all these impl(ghc >= x) flag checks have to be changed to impl(ghc >= x) || impl(ghcjs >= y), not something I'd be looking forward to... Also I personally don't really see it as a hack (of course I'm biased since I've been using it for a while). It just allows you to specify that "compiler x is based on compiler y", so that unless explicitly queried otherwise you can assume that flags for 'y' hold for 'x'. luite
_______________________________________________ cabal-devel mailing list cabal-devel@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cabal-devel