I'm thrilled that there so much Cabal activity! Is anyone working on, or interested in, the issue of compiling and installing the same package against different dependencies? (There was a Google SoC project about this.) Cabal sandboxes address the same issue, but at some user cost. It should Just Work.
Simon From: cabal-devel [mailto:cabal-devel-boun...@haskell.org] On Behalf Of Johan Tibell Sent: 27 November 2013 21:01 To: cabal-devel@haskell.org Subject: Should we aim for a new release in late January? Hi, Cabal development is continuing at a furious pace. There are lots of great things in master that I'd like to get out to users, such as * relinking avoidance * build -j * ability to specify exact deps on the command line * haskell-suite compiler support * bug fixes Here's an approximate list of commits (both Cabal and cabal-install) since the last release: https://github.com/haskell/cabal/compare/Cabal-v1.18.1.2...master It's not entirely accurate as some patches were cherry-picked onto the 1.18 branch and thus have different commit IDs. -- Johan
_______________________________________________ cabal-devel mailing list cabal-devel@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cabal-devel
