Hi Simon, I don't think it's being actively worked on. Duncan and I chat about it once in a while when we meet in person, but we don't have the cycles to do it.
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Simon Peyton-Jones <simo...@microsoft.com>wrote: > I’m thrilled that there so much Cabal activity! > > > > Is anyone working on, or interested in, the issue of compiling and > installing the same package against different dependencies? (There was a > Google SoC project about this.) Cabal sandboxes address the same issue, > but at some user cost. It should Just Work. > > > > Simon > > > > *From:* cabal-devel [mailto:cabal-devel-boun...@haskell.org] *On Behalf > Of *Johan Tibell > *Sent:* 27 November 2013 21:01 > *To:* cabal-devel@haskell.org > *Subject:* Should we aim for a new release in late January? > > > > Hi, > > > > Cabal development is continuing at a furious pace. There are lots of great > things in master that I'd like to get out to users, such as > > > > * relinking avoidance > > * build -j > > * ability to specify exact deps on the command line > > * haskell-suite compiler support > > * bug fixes > > > > Here's an approximate list of commits (both Cabal and cabal-install) since > the last release: > > > > https://github.com/haskell/cabal/compare/Cabal-v1.18.1.2...master > > > > It's not entirely accurate as some patches were cherry-picked onto the > 1.18 branch and thus have different commit IDs. > > > > -- Johan > > >
_______________________________________________ cabal-devel mailing list cabal-devel@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cabal-devel
