I think I can have a RC out without 2 weeks. On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 8:53 AM, Luite Stegeman <stege...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 7:40 PM, Bardur Arantsson <s...@scientician.net> > wrote: > >> >> Mostly out of curiousity: is there *any* conceivable chance of getting >> the GHCJS bits merged in? (I'm hoping/guessing the maintainer of GHCJS >> is also on this list.) >> > > Yes, I am on this list. A small part has already been merged, and there's > a pull request for the changes in the package description and flags, which > include the GHCJS compiler flavour. While discussing the patch with Duncan, > we agreed that a few changes were in order, which I've made, I'll amend the > pull request later today. > > What's left then is the backend itself. The changes there are only in the > build system, so they don't touch the public API / file formats, but on the > other hand they do touch quite a bit of code and require some restructuring > of the GHC backend to allow some of the code to be reused without > copy/pasting the whole backend (smaller customizations are required for > ghc-pkg and haddock). > > I'm going to spend some time this week to submit the next part of the > code, test it with my experimental GHC 7.10 branch of GHCJS. The important > public changes have been discussed / prepared already, so it'll mostly come > down to how well this code will stand up to scrutinization of the reviewers. > > luite > > _______________________________________________ > cabal-devel mailing list > cabal-devel@haskell.org > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cabal-devel > >
_______________________________________________ cabal-devel mailing list cabal-devel@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cabal-devel
