Hello Johan, ...how's progress for a Cabal RC to go w/ GHC 7.10.1 RC1? :-)
On 2014-12-02 at 11:16:46 +0100, Johan Tibell wrote: > I think I can have a RC out without 2 weeks. > > On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 8:53 AM, Luite Stegeman <stege...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 7:40 PM, Bardur Arantsson <s...@scientician.net> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> Mostly out of curiousity: is there *any* conceivable chance of getting >>> the GHCJS bits merged in? (I'm hoping/guessing the maintainer of GHCJS >>> is also on this list.) >>> >> >> Yes, I am on this list. A small part has already been merged, and there's >> a pull request for the changes in the package description and flags, which >> include the GHCJS compiler flavour. While discussing the patch with Duncan, >> we agreed that a few changes were in order, which I've made, I'll amend the >> pull request later today. >> >> What's left then is the backend itself. The changes there are only in the >> build system, so they don't touch the public API / file formats, but on the >> other hand they do touch quite a bit of code and require some restructuring >> of the GHC backend to allow some of the code to be reused without >> copy/pasting the whole backend (smaller customizations are required for >> ghc-pkg and haddock). >> >> I'm going to spend some time this week to submit the next part of the >> code, test it with my experimental GHC 7.10 branch of GHCJS. The important >> public changes have been discussed / prepared already, so it'll mostly come >> down to how well this code will stand up to scrutinization of the reviewers. >> >> luite >> >> _______________________________________________ >> cabal-devel mailing list >> cabal-devel@haskell.org >> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cabal-devel >> >> -- "Elegance is not optional" -- Richard O'Keefe _______________________________________________ cabal-devel mailing list cabal-devel@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cabal-devel
