So far, Cactus has been using version one dot zero (sorry my keyboard has just broken and typing numbers no longer work so I have to do copy-paste which is a nightmare). Recently (a few days), httpclient has moved version one dot zero (which has not been released yet) to a branch and started working on version two dot zero in the main branch.
I have several questions on what is the best route to take for Cactus : * Is version two dot zero functional enough (especially the cookie part) so that we can use the main trunk right now ? * Is gump able/want to use an old httpclient jar and not use the latest CVS version ? Alternatively, could it use a branch ? [I don't think so as it would defeat its main goal] If there is no objection, we'll migrate Cactus to version two dot zero this week end. We'll then see for ourselves if version two dot zero works ... :) Thanks -Vincent ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sam Ruby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jakarta Commons Developers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 1:10 PM Subject: What is so "common" about httpclient? > Versions of httpclient are used by cactus, latka, and slide. What is the > outlook for the creation of a single version that can be used by all three? > > http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/gump/2001-10-05/commons-latka.html > http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/gump/2001-10-05/jakarta-cactus-23.html > h > - Sam Ruby > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
