Of course. :) Hey, would it make sense to introduce a logger on each class
in the cactus package, or better yet a log() method that you could simply
call from any class?

I also wanted to refactor the logging aspect, but I got stuck trying to test
my changes.

Re: the subject line. I meant:
>>RE: Adding Authentication To Cactus

was a mistake (on my part), not a bug.

Cheers,

Nick
-----Original Message-----
From: Vincent Massol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 9:32 AM
To: 'Cactus Developers List'
Subject: RE: Adding Authentication To Cactus


Ok, that would be nice :-), but be careful as we still want to keep the
same rules for logging. The only difference is that entry and exit of
methods must not be explicitly logged as it is done automatically by
AspectJ. But it is still valid to write log statements of course.

Thanks

-Vincent

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nicholas Lesiecki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 04 January 2002 16:07
> To: Cactus Developers List
> Subject: RE: Adding Authentication To Cactus
>
> I noticed we still have code convention about logging on the
contributors
> page. I could edit this sometime this weekend if you like.
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:cactus-dev-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:cactus-dev-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>




--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to