> -----Original Message-----
> From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 22 April 2002 05:46
> To: Cactus Developers List
> Subject: Issue with the 1.3 release
>
> I'm trying to simply replace my previous Cactus build with the new
one,
> and
> it has not gone so smoothly. First, I had to manually tweak my build
file
> to include the AspectJ JAR
yes. See the migration howto on the web site.
> , then I got a new warning about resource
> bundles
yes. There is a change in syntax in Cactus properties file (see the new
Configuration guide on the web site :
http://jakarta.apache.org/cactus/howto_config.html).
> and such and log_client.properties needed in the classpath,
This should not happen and is not needed. Log_client.properties should
be, as usual in cactus.jar (unless you customized it - check the Config
tutorial on the web site as Cactus should now work better with
application logging).
> so I put the
> conf/test directory in my <junit> classpath and replaced my
> log_client.properties file since keys got renamed. My build file is
just
> a
> slightly tweaked version of the 1.2 version sample, so its not as
though
> I've got some hand-made pieces.
>
> Now I'm getting this on my first test case:
>
> Caused an ERROR
> [junit] Not a valid response
> [junit] org.apache.cactus.util.ChainedRuntimeException: Not a
valid
> response
>
> [junit] at
> org.apache.cactus.client.WebTestResultParser.readRootElement(
>
WebTestResultParser.java;org/apache/cactus/util/log/LogAspect.java(1k):1
34
> )
> [junit] at
> org.apache.cactus.client.WebTestResultParser.dispatch29_parse
>
(WebTestResultParser.java;org/apache/cactus/util/log/LogAspect.java(1k):
10
> 1)
> [junit] at
> org.apache.cactus.client.WebTestResultParser.around29_parse(W
>
ebTestResultParser.java;org/apache/cactus/util/log/LogAspect.java(1k):12
04
> )
> [junit] at
> org.apache.cactus.client.WebTestResultParser.parse(WebTestRes
> ultParser.java;org/apache/cactus/util/log/LogAspect.java(1k):96)
> [junit] at
> org.apache.cactus.client.AbstractHttpClient.callGetResult(Abs
>
tractHttpClient.java;org/apache/cactus/util/log/LogAspect.java(1k):231)
> [junit] at
> org.apache.cactus.client.AbstractHttpClient.dispatch1_doTest(
>
AbstractHttpClient.java;org/apache/cactus/util/log/LogAspect.java(1k):12
3)
> [junit] at
> org.apache.cactus.client.AbstractHttpClient.around1_doTest(Ab
>
stractHttpClient.java;org/apache/cactus/util/log/LogAspect.java(1k):1204
)
> [junit] at
> org.apache.cactus.client.AbstractHttpClient.doTest(AbstractHt
> tpClient.java;org/apache/cactus/util/log/LogAspect.java(1k):115)
> [junit] at
> org.apache.cactus.AbstractTestCase.runGenericTest(AbstractTes
> tCase.java:457)
>
> What is going on?
>
Don't know. The cactus log may give you more. In essence it means that
the client side of cactus could not communicate with the server side.
> I would like to get up and running quickly with the new version, and
am
> disappointed that I've encountered so many little things that I had to
do
> manually just to get to this point.
>
I'm sorry if it is complex. It wasn't my intention as you might guess. I
think the main error was to not have put a link to the migration guide
in the announcement email. I have resent it with the link. It should
make things easier. There are normally only 2 changes :
- aspectjrt.jar in CPs
- cactus.properties syntax change for defining the redirector
> Thanks for your help.
>
You're welcome.
-Vincent
> Erik
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:cactus-dev-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:cactus-dev-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
