Hi Florin, I was busy when you submitted all these nice ideas and patches on the cactus mailing list so I may not have been as responsive as I should have. I am just checking now if everything is working fine for you and whether there's any pending thing to commit?
>From looking at the source code, it seems Chris has committed your patch for the URL check. Thanks -Vincent > -----Original Message----- > From: Florin Vancea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 09 July 2003 15:42 > To: Cactus Developers List > Subject: Re: Patch for JBoss starting too slow > > Hi Chris, > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Christopher Lenz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Cactus Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 4:08 PM > Subject: Re: Patch for JBoss starting too slow > > > [snip] > > > I agree, and actually I thought it was doing that already ;-) > > > > So this also makes it unnecessary to expose the wait times, as discussed > before? > > I guess so. At least it works fine for me. > > > > > > I also attach a patch (not necessarily the best approach :) ). > > > > The patch looks good, and I'll commit it. Thanks! > > Great! > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Florin > > > > > > P.S. Seems that the JMX bean that I posted earlier (last week) was not > > > considered a good approach by anyone. Some feedback would have been > nice, > > > though. I hope this one _will_ get some kind of answer (any, including > "quit > > > bugging us"). > > > > I've read your message and had a quick glimpse at the javadocs, but > haven't > > had the time to look in more detail, which would be necessary to give > any > > kind of half-intelligent feedback :-P > > Now I know who was bothering to look at them (I was kind of monitoring the > accesses) :) > > Actually after I took a deeper look at the Cactus-integration sources I > see > that hot-deployment is not provisioned for in the current architecture, so > my bean is not that useful for Cactus. > I myself am currently pre-deploying (with JMX wait) before launching the > <cactus...> task. It works well (with JBoss pre-started) and IMO there's > no > reason for doing any changes. > Maybe I jumped the gun a little when suggesting the inclusion of JMX wait. > Now I realize that not all containers may support hot-deploy and that's > not > Cactus's concern anyway since pre-deployment is possible. > > > > > Don't give up yet! > > Won't, thanks. > > Florin > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
