Thanks for the callback, anyway. I got around some issues by patching my own copy of Cactus, others were taken care of by Christopher.
Florin ----- Original Message ----- From: "Vincent Massol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Cactus Developers List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2003 6:21 PM Subject: RE: Patch for JBoss starting too slow > Hi Florin, > > I was busy when you submitted all these nice ideas and patches on the > cactus mailing list so I may not have been as responsive as I should > have. I am just checking now if everything is working fine for you and > whether there's any pending thing to commit? > > >From looking at the source code, it seems Chris has committed your patch > for the URL check. > > Thanks > -Vincent > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Florin Vancea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 09 July 2003 15:42 > > To: Cactus Developers List > > Subject: Re: Patch for JBoss starting too slow > > > > Hi Chris, > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Christopher Lenz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Cactus Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 4:08 PM > > Subject: Re: Patch for JBoss starting too slow > > > > > > [snip] > > > > > I agree, and actually I thought it was doing that already ;-) > > > > > > So this also makes it unnecessary to expose the wait times, as > discussed > > before? > > > > I guess so. At least it works fine for me. > > > > > > > > > I also attach a patch (not necessarily the best approach :) ). > > > > > > The patch looks good, and I'll commit it. Thanks! > > > > Great! > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Florin > > > > > > > > P.S. Seems that the JMX bean that I posted earlier (last week) was > not > > > > considered a good approach by anyone. Some feedback would have > been > > nice, > > > > though. I hope this one _will_ get some kind of answer (any, > including > > "quit > > > > bugging us"). > > > > > > I've read your message and had a quick glimpse at the javadocs, but > > haven't > > > had the time to look in more detail, which would be necessary to > give > > any > > > kind of half-intelligent feedback :-P > > > > Now I know who was bothering to look at them (I was kind of monitoring > the > > accesses) :) > > > > Actually after I took a deeper look at the Cactus-integration sources > I > > see > > that hot-deployment is not provisioned for in the current > architecture, so > > my bean is not that useful for Cactus. > > I myself am currently pre-deploying (with JMX wait) before launching > the > > <cactus...> task. It works well (with JBoss pre-started) and IMO > there's > > no > > reason for doing any changes. > > Maybe I jumped the gun a little when suggesting the inclusion of JMX > wait. > > Now I realize that not all containers may support hot-deploy and > that's > > not > > Cactus's concern anyway since pre-deployment is possible. > > > > > > > > Don't give up yet! > > > > Won't, thanks. > > > > Florin > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
