I trust your judgement, though I know little about Maven. If Maven would simplify the current build process I am all for it.
+0 (I'm for it, but I'm unlikely to help) Cheers, Nick --- Vincent Massol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > This follows a recent email exchange with Julien about his work with a > Maven build for Cactus. > > I'd like to have your opinion about committing, next to our Ant build > file, a maven build. The idea will be to progressively make it as good > (or better) than our current build (by that, I mean that we should not > loose build features). We won't stop using the Ant build till we are > completely satisfied with the maven build. > > I can see several factor of possible success here: > - the fact that Julien seems keen to help us on a long term > - the fact that I know Maven quite well and that I am a Maven committer > (thus I can tweak maven to make it work for our use case) > - the fact that Jason Van Zyl (initial creator of Maven) wanted to do > the move to Maven for Cactus a while ago and I'm sure he's keen to help > us in maven land to accommodate cactus needs in term of build > > What do you say? > > Here's my +1 to committing the patches that Julien send us for a maven > build. > > Thanks > -Vincent > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
