Hi Vincent, > Hi Nicolas, > > Thanks for those patches. I haven't had a look yet (I'm still on holiday > till the 8th of August and I'm trying to do things other than coding... > ;-)). Me too ;-) the 8th of August
> As soon as I'm back I'll check them out (I may possibly do it earlier > if I get bored before the end of the holidays). Bored during holidays !! > As for Strutstescase, I'm unsure. The point is that the strutstestcase > project is a separate project. It has nothing to do with the Cactus project > (apart from the fact that it extends Cactus). I have no knowledge of it > either. Thus I am loathe to include a dependency to it as there'll be stuff > to fix or modify and I won't be able to do it. Thus the sample will become > unsupported and will be broken (that's also the problem of OSS projects > accepting all contributions without maintainers for them). I will write an other sample or include a test in the existing one in that case. In fact I just need to do a copy paste in an existing test. > In view of all this I think it makes more sense that you sample belongs to > the strutstestcase project itself rather than to the Cactus project. > > What do you think? This sample is trivial and the strutstestcase include some more signifiant example. Integrate strutstestcase with Cactus is as simple as doing some Jsp/Servlet Test, it is just the way to write test and you don't have any thing to configure, just launch Cactus ... > Thanks > -Vincent Nicolas --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
