Personally I think clientSetUp and clientTearDown make more sense, assuming they work just like setUp and tearDown (once per test).
-Pat ----- Original Message ----- From: "Vincent Massol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "'Cactus Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 10:56 AM Subject: [VOTE] Rename clientSetUp() and clientTearDown() in 1.5dev > Hi, > > Charles Massey has proposed on the 15th of July another name for the > clientSetUp() and clientTearDown() methods : begin() and end(). > > I think it is a better name than what we have and I propose to make the > change to begin() and end(). It is more logical as we already have > beginXXX() and endXXX() methods. > > What do you think ? > > Here is my +1 > > Thanks > -Vincent > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
