> -----Original Message-----
> From: Patrick Lightbody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 01 August 2002 18:48
> To: Vincent Massol; 'Cactus Users List'
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Rename clientSetUp() and clientTearDown() in
1.5dev
>
> Well, since you put it that way... I see your point. My only concern
is
> confusion between beginXxx() and begin(), being that one is tied to an
> individual test and the other is tied to the test suite, yet they both
> share
> a common name.
yes, I also see your point ... :-). I don't really care but we need a
name with which cactus users will be comfortable with as it will be hard
to change once it is released. Hence the vote I have asked. ATM more
persons seem to prefer begin() and end(). Let's let it open for a few
days and we'll see then.
Could you live with begin() and end() if that choice was made or are you
categorically -1 ?
Thanks
-Vincent
>
> -Pat
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Vincent Massol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "'Cactus Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: "'Patrick Lightbody'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 6:43 PM
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Rename clientSetUp() and clientTearDown() in
1.5dev
>
>
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Patrick Lightbody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: 01 August 2002 11:11
> > > To: Cactus Users List
> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Rename clientSetUp() and clientTearDown() in
> > 1.5dev
> > >
> > > Personally I think clientSetUp and clientTearDown make more sense,
> > > assuming
> > > they work just like setUp and tearDown (once per test).
> >
> > ... yes, but Cactus has already extended JUnit by having beginXXX()
and
> > endXXX() methods that are executed on the client side. In other
words,
> > Cactus is "Junit-compliant" on the server side but the client side
is
> > purely Cactus-specific.
> >
> > As we already have beginXXX() and endXXX(), don't you think it looks
> > logical to have begin() and end() being global extensions (before
and
> > after each test) ?
> >
> > Thanks
> > -Vincent
> >
> > >
> > > -Pat
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Vincent Massol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Cc: "'Cactus Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 10:56 AM
> > > Subject: [VOTE] Rename clientSetUp() and clientTearDown() in
1.5dev
> > >
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Charles Massey has proposed on the 15th of July another name for
the
> > > > clientSetUp() and clientTearDown() methods : begin() and end().
> > > >
> > > > I think it is a better name than what we have and I propose to
make
> > the
> > > > change to begin() and end(). It is more logical as we already
have
> > > > beginXXX() and endXXX() methods.
> > > >
> > > > What do you think ?
> > > >
> > > > Here is my +1
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > > -Vincent
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:cactus-user-
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:cactus-user-
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
