Vincent
I have used Artur Hefcyz testsgen to generate skeleton code for 2 differing
situations and in both cases they worked extremely well
I was looking for a like minded Cactus TestCase generator if you know of one
I would appreciate a link
Many Thanks,
Martin
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Vincent Massol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Cactus Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2003 3:33 PM
Subject: Automated cactus generation tool (was RE: RE: Good bye Tarek (was
RE: REPOST: RE: Authentication Failure --> Problem Found))


> Hi Martin,
>
> Sorry but I don't know what an automated junit generation tool is. Do
> you mean a tool that generates skeleton TestCase?
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Martin Gainty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 24 November 2003 02:26
> > To: Cactus Users List
> > Subject: Re: RE: Good bye Tarek (was RE: REPOST: RE: Authentication
> > Failure --> Problem Found)
> >
> > On the same note is there a automated cactus generation tool such as
> the
> > one for junit?
> > Thanks,
> > Martin
> >   >From: "Eric Pugh"
> >   >Reply-To:
> >   >To: "'Cactus Users List'"
> >   >Subject: RE: Good bye Tarek (was RE: REPOST: RE: Authentication
> Failure
> > --> Problem Found)
> >   >Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2003 14:11:10 +0100
> >   >MIME-Version: 1.0
> >   >Received: from mail.apache.org ([208.185.179.12]) by mc3-
> > f34.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Sun, 23 Nov
> 2003
> > 05:11:14 -0800
> >   >Received: (qmail 33135 invoked by uid 500); 23 Nov 2003 13:11:10
> -0000
> >   >Received: (qmail 33122 invoked from network); 23 Nov 2003 13:11:09
> -
> > 0000
> >   >Received: from unknown (HELO hqexch01.upstate.com)
> (205.160.101.145) by
> > daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Nov 2003 13:11:09 -0000
> >   >Received: from IQUITOS (ciaranlaptop.ltd.upstate.com
> [172.17.1.100]) by
> > hqexch01.upstate.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail
> Service
> > Version 5.5.2653.13)id XCTZ3QH3; Sun, 23 Nov 2003 08:12:08 -0500
> >   >X-Message-Info: JGTYoYF78jG1z8iUJ+kGbDb/g/AcfLAS
> >   >Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by
> ezmlm
> >   >Precedence: bulk
> >   >List-Unsubscribe:
> >   >List-Subscribe:
> >   >List-Help:
> >   >List-Post:
> >   >List-Id: "Cactus Users List"
> >   >Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >   >Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >   >X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
> >   >X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> >   >X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
> >   >In-Reply-To:
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >   >Importance: Normal
> >   >X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
> >   >X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
> 000000003F7DA61201DEFA4D8CC4384DDEAFB94164F0D200
> >   >X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N
> >   >Return-Path: cactus-user-return-4852-
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >   >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Nov 2003 13:11:14.0075 (UTC)
> > FILETIME=[4596B6B0:01C3B1C3]
> >   >
> >   >Just a heads up on Mock objects.. they seem simple, they aren't.
> There
> > are
> >   >a lot of weird subtleness issues with the order of setting up
> expected
> >   >results. And the concept of using generic objects to record a
> series of
> >   >expected results, and then verifing the expected results occur with
> a
> > real
> >   >object? Egads..! Cactus has lots of setup issues, that is where
> most
> >   >bugs/heartache comes from. MockObjects, especially once you get
> beyonnd
> > the
> >   >super simple onces, have a lot of difficult concepts to grok
> instead..
> >   >
> >   >The two technologies are both difficult, simple on the surface, but
> > more
> >   >complex as you get deeper. Something that may help with learning
> cactus
> > is
> >   >to A) buy the book. b) Start over with much simpler use cases. When
> i
> >   >tried Cactus the first time, I tried to apply it to a very complex
> > database
> >   >driven, xml parsing, coffee brewing app! Well, it didn't brew
> coffee,
> > but
> >   >almost. It was very frustrating. So then I went and tried out
> cactus
> >   >testing with the JNDI code for commons-configuration, and it was
> much
> >   >simpler.. Contributing that code helped me get a success under my
> belt
> > and
> >   >made getting deeper into cactus much more enjoyable.
> >   >
> >   >I do think my motto: "Nothing is ever easy..." is very applicable
> to
> >   >software development..!
> >   >
> >   >Eric
> >   >
> >   > > -----Original Message-----
> >   > > From: Tarek M. Nabil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >   > > Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2003 11:19 AM
> >   > > To: Cactus Users List
> >   > > Subject: RE: Good bye Tarek (was RE: REPOST: RE:
> >   > > Authentication Failure
> >   > > --> Problem Found)
> >   > >
> >   > >
> >   > > Vincent,
> >   > >
> >   > >
> >   > > AFAIK, there are not many known bugs. 99.99% of the time it
> >   > > is an error
> >   > > from its users. J2EE stuff is complex.
> >   > >
> >   > >
> >   > > Maybe that's because there are a lot of subtle things that
> >   > > you need to do to get it to work, and they're never mentioned
> >   > > in the documentation.
> >   > >
> >   > >
> >   > > There are other ways to pay back apart from money, like
> >   > > giving your time to help
> >   > > the others and contributing. I can tell you that if you're
> > recognized
> >   > > for doing this others will more likely help you out. That's how
> > things
> >   > > work in life. It's also true for open source.
> >   > >
> >   > >
> >   > > That's easier said than done. How can you contribute to
> >   > > something you can't understand? If you have a problem and you
> >   > > never find out how to solve it, what do you have to contribute?
> >   > >
> >   > > Anyway, thanks to everyone. And, BTW, mock objects are my
> >   > > next trial, so wish me luck.
> >   > >
> >   > > Thanks,
> >   > > Tarek Nabil
> >   > >
> >   > > -----Original Message-----
> >   > > From: Vincent Massol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >   > > Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2003 12:06 PM
> >   > > To: 'Cactus Users List'
> >   > > Subject: Good bye Tarek (was RE: REPOST: RE: Authentication
> >   > > Failure -->
> >   > > Problem Found)
> >   > >
> >   > >
> >   > >
> >   > >
> >   > > > -----Original Message-----
> >   > > > From: Tarek M. Nabil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >   > > > Sent: 23 November 2003 10:22
> >   > > > To: Cactus Users List
> >   > > > Subject: RE: REPOST: RE: Authentication Failure --> Problem
> Found
> >   > > >
> >   > > > Hi Andrew,
> >   > > >
> >   > > > Thanks for your support. I hope that you and everyone else
> will
> > have
> >   > > > better luck with your efforts. As for me, I've decided to drop
> the
> >   > > whole
> >   > > > Cactus idea. The problem I described below took me several
> days to
> >   > > > determine the root cause and until now, I haven't been able to
> > solve
> >   > > it.
> >   > > > Now, that I'm even faced with more problems writing trivial
> >   > > tests, and
> >   > > my
> >   > > > questions are not being answered by anyone, it seems that the
> > whole
> >   > > thing
> >   > > > is losing its meaning. This is supposed to increase
> >   > > productivity, not
> >   > > > hinder it.
> >   > > >
> >   > > > Maybe in the future, when the framework is less buggy and
> there
> > are
> >   > > more
> >   > > > developers dedicated to support, maybe then I will try again.
> >   > >
> >   > > AFAIK, there are not many known bugs. 99.99% of the time it
> >   > > is an error
> >   > > from its users. J2EE stuff is complex.
> >   > >
> >   > > >
> >   > > > Before I unsubscribe from this list, I just want to say that I
> > still
> >   > > > believe in the open source model. But open source projects
> >   > > need a lot
> >   > > of
> >   > > > effort before they're embraced by the developer community.
> >   > >
> >   > > *You* are the open source, so it's only as good as you can make
> it.
> >   > > There's no one paid to support you, Tarek. We're all busy
> >   > > working on our
> >   > > day work and we're only developing/supporting at night time,
> >   > > during our
> >   > > free time.
> >   > >
> >   > > That said, nobody is preventing your from hiring support
> services to
> >   > > help you out. AFAIK, you haven't approached anybody for that.
> >   > > There are
> >   > > other ways to pay back apart from money, like giving your time
> to
> > help
> >   > > the others and contributing. I can tell you that if you're
> > recognized
> >   > > for doing this others will more likely help you out. That's how
> > things
> >   > > work in life. It's also true for open source.
> >   > >
> >   > > > The most
> >   > > > important of these efforts is support to the community
> >   > > through mailing
> >   > > > lists like this. Unfortunately, this is not the case here.
> >   > >
> >   > > Feel free to come back when you've something to contribute.
> >   > >
> >   > > Thanks and good luck
> >   > > -Vincent
> >   > >
> >   > > PS: If you don't want to use Cactus, the other alternative you
> > should
> >   > > consider is using mock objects.
> >   > >
> >   > > [snip]
> >   > >
> >   > >
> >   > >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > -
> >   > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >   > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >   > >
> >   > >
> >   > >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > -
> >   > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >   > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >   >
> >
> >---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >   >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >   >For additional commands, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to