jan damborsky wrote:
> Dave Miner wrote:
>> jan damborsky wrote:
>>> Hi Dave,
>>>
>>>
>>> Dave Miner wrote:
>>>> jan damborsky wrote:
>>>>> Hi Moriah,
>>>>>
>>>>> Moriah Waterland wrote:
>>>>>> Sounds like a great idea.  I am POC this week and am looking at 
>>>>>> cleaning
>>>>>> up bugs.  Let me know what you guys decide and I would be happy to
>>>>>> implement it.
>>>>> I really appreciate your help in this area, since to be honest I am 
>>>>> not sure
>>>>> about how to create new Bugzilla category and if I have enough 
>>>>> permissions
>>>>> to do it.
>>>>>
>>>> Before we add anything, I'd like a clear definition of what it 
>>>> encompasses vs. the other components that are already in the 
>>>> installer product.
>>>
>>> With respect to pieces, which are being introduced for AI
>>> (and seems to be AI specific so far), I can think about following
>>> (there might be more) which might fall into this new bug category:
>>>
>>> * AI install engine
>>>   - this will be AI equivalent of gui-install Slim install
>>>     gui-install
>>>   - it consumes IPS and standard install libraries (libtd,
>>>     libti, libbe, liborchestrator,...)
>>>
>>> * AI service discovery (AISD) & AI service choosing (AISC) engines
>>>   - called from AI smf service in order to accomplish
>>>     AI specific tasks
>>>
>>> * AI tools
>>>   - serve for setting AI install server and client
>>>     - publication of OSInstall service
>>>     - DHCP network setup
>>>     - client configuration
>>>     - AI manifest publication
>>>
>>> * AI SMF service & appropriate method
>>>   - invokes AISD, AISC, AI install engine
>>>
>>>>   Also, any name chosen needs to be meaningful to somebody not on 
>>>> the project - not "AI" but perhaps "automation".
>>>
>>> That is a good point. I think 'automation' is good candidate.
>>>
>>
>> This actually sounds to me like at least 3 new components:
>>
>> - installadm
> 
> Since it will fall into Product 'installer' I think we might
> not need redundant 'install' in name of Component -
> maybe 'admintools' ?
> 

installadm is the name of the command, isn't it?  That's why I suggested it.

Dave

Reply via email to