Dave Miner wrote: > jan damborsky wrote: >> Dave Miner wrote: >>> jan damborsky wrote: >>>> Hi Dave, >>>> >>>> >>>> Dave Miner wrote: >>>>> jan damborsky wrote: >>>>>> Hi Moriah, >>>>>> >>>>>> Moriah Waterland wrote: >>>>>>> Sounds like a great idea. I am POC this week and am looking at >>>>>>> cleaning >>>>>>> up bugs. Let me know what you guys decide and I would be happy to >>>>>>> implement it. >>>>>> I really appreciate your help in this area, since to be honest I >>>>>> am not sure >>>>>> about how to create new Bugzilla category and if I have enough >>>>>> permissions >>>>>> to do it. >>>>>> >>>>> Before we add anything, I'd like a clear definition of what it >>>>> encompasses vs. the other components that are already in the >>>>> installer product. >>>> >>>> With respect to pieces, which are being introduced for AI >>>> (and seems to be AI specific so far), I can think about following >>>> (there might be more) which might fall into this new bug category: >>>> >>>> * AI install engine >>>> - this will be AI equivalent of gui-install Slim install >>>> gui-install >>>> - it consumes IPS and standard install libraries (libtd, >>>> libti, libbe, liborchestrator,...) >>>> >>>> * AI service discovery (AISD) & AI service choosing (AISC) engines >>>> - called from AI smf service in order to accomplish >>>> AI specific tasks >>>> >>>> * AI tools >>>> - serve for setting AI install server and client >>>> - publication of OSInstall service >>>> - DHCP network setup >>>> - client configuration >>>> - AI manifest publication >>>> >>>> * AI SMF service & appropriate method >>>> - invokes AISD, AISC, AI install engine >>>> >>>>> Also, any name chosen needs to be meaningful to somebody not on >>>>> the project - not "AI" but perhaps "automation". >>>> >>>> That is a good point. I think 'automation' is good candidate. >>>> >>> >>> This actually sounds to me like at least 3 new components: >>> >>> - installadm >> >> Since it will fall into Product 'installer' I think we might >> not need redundant 'install' in name of Component - >> maybe 'admintools' ? >> > > installadm is the name of the command, isn't it? That's why I > suggested it.
I see - got it now :-) Thanks ! Jan
