Sanjay Nadkarni wrote:
> slim_install.c:
> Should the size for swap_device[100] be replaced with a #define. 
> (void) for 441, 442.
Sure. I will change this.
>
> 1951:  Since failure from umount is not checked, perhaps you should 
> use umount -f.
>
Ok will do.

thanks,
sarah
***
>
> -Sanjay
>
>
> Sundar Yamunachari wrote:
>> Sarah Jelinek wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I need 2 reviewers for the following changes:
>>>
>>> -Fix the slice info to include a separate swap slice. We were 
>>> previously using a zvol for swap.
>>> -Fix the /etc/vfstab entry for the new swap device
>>> -Add enable_nwam and network_nwam.xml to SUNWadmc so that we can 
>>> enable nwam during postinstall
>>> -Misc nits cleanups.
>>>
>>> The webrev is located at:
>>>
>>> http://anthrax.central/net/boora.central/brmnas/sjelinek/caiman/slim/webrev/
>>>  
>>>
>>>
>>> Apologies to those who are not Sun employees. This source isn't open 
>>> yet so you can't review it. It should be open in the next week or so.
>>>
>>> Thank you in advance for your help,
>>> sarah
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> caiman-discuss mailing list
>>> caiman-discuss at opensolaris.org
>>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss
>>>   
>> Sarah,
>>
>> *usr/src/lib/liborchestrator/orchestrator_private.h:
>> *
>> 80 #define FOUR_GB_TO_MB 4098
>>
>> - The value should be 4096
>>
>> *usr/src/lib/liborchestrator/perform_slim_install.c:
>>
>> *Line 1906: buf is not used in the function 
>> setup_etc_vfstab_for_zfs_root(). You can remove buf.
>>
>> *usr/src/pkgdefs/SUNWadmc/prototype_com:
>>
>> *A nit. Move line 65 (f none sbin/enable_nwam) up after 60 (d none 
>> sbin 0755 root sys) so that all sbin files are grouped together and 
>> all var files are grouped together.
>>
>> - Sundar
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> caiman-discuss mailing list
>> caiman-discuss at opensolaris.org
>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss
>>   
>
>

Reply via email to