Hi Dave, > Caimaniacs, > > We'll be using the bugzilla sandbox that Stephen's set up on > defect.opensolaris.org/bz as the bug management mechanism for Indiana > (if you haven't created an account yet, please do). To finish setting > things up, we need to agree on a taxonomy for our projects. > > Bugzilla has a 3-level scheme: Classification, Product, Component. > Equating them to Bugster's Product, Category, Subcategory is probably > the simplest thing to do; in the current case, Development and perhaps > Released are being proposed as the global standard for Classification; > Development has already been created. Within that, I'm suggesting we > have the following: > > Product: installer > Component: gui > Component: library > Component: cli (future) > Component: automation (future) > Component: text_ui (future) > > Product: distro_constructor > Component: cli > Component: gui (future) > > I'm sure this is incomplete. Two issues that certainly seem to not be > covered by the above: > > 1. Where to put live CD bugs (e.g. it doesn't boot, nwam doesn't work, > etc.)? Perhaps we need another product for it? > I think we do need another product for it. But, then we might have confusion about the installer piece of the liveCD which I assume would go under the installer product.
Maybe this is just another OpenSolaris release, such as OpenSolaris/liveCD/<component>? sarah **** > 2. Where will we handle test suite bugs (when we have suites, of course)? > > Comments, suggestions, flames welcome. > > Dave > > > _______________________________________________ > caiman-discuss mailing list > caiman-discuss at opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss > >
