Sarah Jelinek wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
>> Caimaniacs,
>>
>> We'll be using the bugzilla sandbox that Stephen's set up on
>> defect.opensolaris.org/bz as the bug management mechanism for Indiana
>> (if you haven't created an account yet, please do). To finish setting
>> things up, we need to agree on a taxonomy for our projects.
>>
>> Bugzilla has a 3-level scheme: Classification, Product, Component.
>> Equating them to Bugster's Product, Category, Subcategory is probably
>> the simplest thing to do; in the current case, Development and perhaps
>> Released are being proposed as the global standard for Classification;
>> Development has already been created. Within that, I'm suggesting we
>> have the following:
>>
>> Product: installer
>> Component: gui
>> Component: library
>> Component: cli (future)
>> Component: automation (future)
>> Component: text_ui (future)
>>
>> Product: distro_constructor
>> Component: cli
>> Component: gui (future)
>>
>> I'm sure this is incomplete. Two issues that certainly seem to not be
>> covered by the above:
>>
>> 1. Where to put live CD bugs (e.g. it doesn't boot, nwam doesn't work,
>> etc.)? Perhaps we need another product for it?
>>
> I think we do need another product for it. But, then we might have
> confusion about the installer piece of the liveCD which I assume would
> go under the installer product.
>
> Maybe this is just another OpenSolaris release, such as
> OpenSolaris/liveCD/<component>?
>
I haven't had time to follow the whole discussion over on tools-discuss
about the global taxonomy, but I don't think we were going to have
OpenSolaris as a Classification, so it'd be more like
"Development/livecd/{boot, application}" or something like that.
Dave
