Well now I'm confused. The check appears to only be true if the malloc fails. So what does this have to do with the comment? The comment is nice for the if at 820 so I wouldn't remove it though. Were we actually seeing malloc fail?
Jean Alok Aggarwal wrote: > On Tue, 14 Oct 2008, Sanjay Nadkarni wrote: > > >> Could you please add a comment as to why moving the code under transfer_attr >> != NULL fixes the issue. >> > > Good idea. I've added a comment. Could you > please take a look and see if this adequate? > > http://cr.opensolaris.org/~aalok/3889-comment > > Alok > _______________________________________________ > caiman-discuss mailing list > caiman-discuss at opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss >
