Karen:

AWESOME!  I'd guess the three examples you've included are what many
people working with the distro constructor will end up wanting to know
how to do.

Thanks!

Will

On Fri, 2008-10-17 at 15:19 -0700, Karen Tung wrote:
> Hi Barbara,
> 
> I updated the TOI page to include finalizer script examples on 
> adding/deleting packages.
> I even added an example for adding a SVR4 package for debugging purposes.
> I got questions about how to do that in the last couple of weeks, so,
> I thought I will just document it here.  I know we are only supporting 
> IPS package now.
> So, if there are any objections on having the SVR4 example there, I can 
> remove it.
> 
> The TOI link, in case you need it:
> 
> http://opensolaris.org/os/project/caiman/Constructor/DC_docs/DC_toi.html
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> --Karen
> 
> Karen Tung wrote:
> > There are a whole bunch of things that we support in the manifest that
> > are not there in the slim_cd.xml manifest we ship today, because those
> > values are not used in creating the Live CD.
> >
> > I am thinking that we should  supply a "complete" manifest, with all
> > the tags we currently support in there.  That way, people don't
> > need to dig through the code to find what tags they should specify.  The 
> > documents
> > can also point to that file.
> >
> > An example of how to add or delete from the "standard" set of packages
> > for debugging purposes  would be useful.  I will come up with something 
> > tomorrow and post it here.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > --Karen
> >
> >
> > Jean McCormack wrote:
> >   
> >> That's one thing we should make sure to walk through on Tuesday.
> >>
> >> Jean
> >>
> >> Barbara.Lundquist at Sun.COM wrote:
> >>   
> >>     
> >>> All,
> >>>
> >>> I'll start a list of stuff that I can add to the DC document.
> >>>
> >>> Jean, when you have comments in the manifest, I'd like to include that 
> >>> copy of the manifest as an appendix in my document. And, I can use 
> >>> your comments to improve the main doc instructions.
> >>>
> >>> I skimmed Willie's email about adding or deleting packages and agree 
> >>> that this should be added to the document, but I'll have to work 
> >>> through it some to get it in shape to add to the document. I'm not 
> >>> understanding the procedure just from the emails.
> >>>
> >>> I'm going to go ahead and route the doc as is for review week today or 
> >>> tomorrow, but we can add more of this information to the document over 
> >>> the next couple weeks.
> >>> Barbara
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 10/16/08 14:06, Jean McCormack wrote:
> >>>     
> >>>       
> >>>> I definitely agree that an example of how to add or delete packages so 
> >>>> the user doesn't have
> >>>> to modify the manifest and repull all the IPS packages would be good.
> >>>>
> >>>> pkg_repo_addl_authority is supported and the user can add it to the 
> >>>> manifest. There are several
> >>>> other manifest items that fall into this category. I'm going to file a 
> >>>> bug and work on putting
> >>>> comments into the manifest so the user understand what they are for and 
> >>>> that they can use them.
> >>>>
> >>>> jean
> >>>>
> >>>> Barbara.Lundquist at Sun.COM wrote:
> >>>>   
> >>>>       
> >>>>         
> >>>>> Karen, Jean, and Jack,
> >>>>> Can you take a look at the feedback we got from Willie below? Sorry I 
> >>>>> set this feedback aside
> >>>>> till this week, but we still have plenty of time to incorporate some 
> >>>>> of Willie's ideas to the DC document before I deliver the doc for 
> >>>>> 2008.11.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Per Willie's suggestions, I don't see the pkg_repo_addl_authority 
> >>>>> element in the sample slim_cd.xml file I have. Are we not using that 
> >>>>> element for 2008.11? Should people just edit the many repository field 
> >>>>> in the manifest instead of adding this additional authority field?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Can you also comment on Willie's suggestions about how to keep 
> >>>>> revising packages without
> >>>>> starting over? We could add some coverage in docs about that, but 
> >>>>> would need your input.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I won't have Willie's input in the review draft this week, but we can 
> >>>>> still make his changes for final delivery.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Barbara
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -------- Original Message --------
> >>>>> Subject:        Re: [caiman-discuss] FYI Alpha Draft of Distr Constr 
> >>>>> Article
> >>>>> Date:   Fri, 26 Sep 2008 09:06:17 -0700
> >>>>> From:   Barbara.Lundquist at Sun.COM
> >>>>> To:     Willie Walker <William.Walker at Sun.COM>, Barbara Lundquist 
> >>>>> <Barbara.Lundquist at Sun.COM>
> >>>>> References:     <48DBCEB3.50703 at Sun.COM> 
> >>>>> <ce4f4bbcb7d02365dcef6dec02b74484 at sun.com>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thank you!! This is great input!
> >>>>> I'm on another project for a few days, but will integrate your 
> >>>>> suggestions when I do another draft of the DC article.
> >>>>> Barbara
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 09/26/08 06:30, Willie Walker wrote:
> >>>>>     
> >>>>>         
> >>>>>           
> >>>>>> Hi Barbara:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I'm sending this just to you so it doesn't cause a flurry of reviews 
> >>>>>> that you haven't asked for.  :-)  I think the document looks good and 
> >>>>>> the direction/scope are great.  One thing I think that needs to be 
> >>>>>> considered is the audience, which will probably non-Sun people making 
> >>>>>> a custom distribution that includes packages and modifications that 
> >>>>>> are not part of the opensolaris.org IPS.  For example, they might be 
> >>>>>> adding proprietary packages maintained on a private IPS.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Given this, I think the pkg_repo_addl_authority element of the 
> >>>>>> manifest needs some specific discussion.  I had to search for it in 
> >>>>>> the source code.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> In addition, if the audience is anything like I am, they won't get the 
> >>>>>> distribution right the first time they try.  Instead, they will 
> >>>>>> probably focus on modifications to a small set of packages in the 
> >>>>>> distribution, rebuilding the distro each time they make a change.    
> >>>>>> From what I can tell from the TOI calls and my own personal 
> >>>>>> experience, I suspect an FAQ is going to be "How do I 
> >>>>>> replace/modify/remove specific packages in my distribution without 
> >>>>>> having to pull all the packages each time I make a change?"  To help 
> >>>>>> with this, an appendix that describes an example use of checkpointing 
> >>>>>> might be very useful.  A specific example I'm thinking of is a 
> >>>>>> finalizer that sits right in the front of all the other finalizers and 
> >>>>>> tweaks the installed packages on the system.  The Sep 24, 2008 7:33 AM 
> >>>>>> message I posted here contains a rough example: 
> >>>>>> http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=75218&tstart=15.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks!
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Will
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Sep 25, 2008, at 1:47 PM, Barbara.Lundquist at Sun.COM wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>       
> >>>>>>           
> >>>>>>             
> >>>>>>> Gang,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I've roughed out an alpha draft of a "Distribution Constructor Guide" 
> >>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>> posted it on this page:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/caiman/files/
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> See DistroConstr.pdf.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> IMPORTANT: There are still significant engineering changes that will 
> >>>>>>> affect
> >>>>>>> this document, so I'm not asking for a review of the details of this 
> >>>>>>> document yet.
> >>>>>>> However, I welcome comments about the overall design and scope of the 
> >>>>>>> document.
> >>>>>>> I know there's alot left to do for this document, but you can at 
> >>>>>>> least see what
> >>>>>>> direction I'm heading in.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hopefully, we'll be ready for a full review in early October, at or 
> >>>>>>> near the
> >>>>>>> code freeze date, TBD.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Comments welcome.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Barbara
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>> caiman-discuss mailing list
> >>>>>>> caiman-discuss at opensolaris.org
> >>>>>>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss
> >>>>>>>         
> >>>>>>>             
> >>>>>>>               
> >>>>>   
> >>>>>     
> >>>>>         
> >>>>>           
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> caiman-discuss mailing list
> >>>> caiman-discuss at opensolaris.org
> >>>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss
> >>>>   
> >>>>       
> >>>>         
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> caiman-discuss mailing list
> >> caiman-discuss at opensolaris.org
> >> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss
> >>   
> >>     
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > caiman-discuss mailing list
> > caiman-discuss at opensolaris.org
> > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss
> >   
> 
> _______________________________________________
> caiman-discuss mailing list
> caiman-discuss at opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss


Reply via email to