Could you also add a test for providing a description to beCopy in tbeadm.c so
this is easier to test?

As far as the changes go they look fine to me.

Thanks!
-evan

Tim Knitter wrote:
> In order to test the functionality that this code exposes, beadm has also been
> modified to make use of the new interface in libbe.c and is being addressed by
> this bug. A [-d description] opt & arg is beaing added to the beadm usage for 
> create as follows:
> 
> beadm create [-a] [-d description] [-e non-activeBeName | beName at snapshot]
>     [-o property=value] ... [-p zpool] beName
> 
> Please see the updated webrev that includes the changes to make the above 
> happen.
> 
> These changes have been successfully tested on bld99.
> 
> Thanks
> Tim
>  
> Tim Knitter wrote:
>> Caimaniacs,
>>
>> Please review the following simple change:
>>
>> 4054 beCopy() needs to take parameter for BE description
>>
>> WR: http://cr.opensolaris.org/~tsk/4054/
>> B:  http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=4054
>>
>> This has been tested on bld99 with pkg(1) and beadm(1M).
>>
>> Thanks
>> Tim
>> _______________________________________________
>> caiman-discuss mailing list
>> caiman-discuss at opensolaris.org
>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss
> _______________________________________________
> caiman-discuss mailing list
> caiman-discuss at opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss


Reply via email to