On Mon, 2 Mar 2009, Juergen Keil wrote: > If offset 5 is supposed to encode the uncompressed > data size, shouldn't the above code use > > t = srclen; > > instead of > > t = *dstlen;
It should, please see the updated webrev. Alok
On Mon, 2 Mar 2009, Juergen Keil wrote: > If offset 5 is supposed to encode the uncompressed > data size, shouldn't the above code use > > t = srclen; > > instead of > > t = *dstlen;
It should, please see the updated webrev. Alok