On Tue, 14 Apr 2009, Dave Miner wrote: >> slimcd_pre_bootroot_pkg_image_mod: lines 130-139: Why >> remove this? It seems that it's only a matter of time >> before the microroot grows again and so we'll back to >> looking for ways like these to curtail the size of the >> microroot. >> > > These deviations are generally undesirable to maintain, as they are > dependent on implementation details of the particular GNOME version. The > direction here is for the desktop group to own providing a reduced-usage > session if needed, rather than us building a bunch of hacks into the > construction process. The updated branding for 2009.06 meant either xdesign > providing a new image for this, or just removing it; looked like about 1 MB > of memory usage difference vs. the old branding image, so I judged it better > to remove it.
That makes sense. The updated webrev looks fine as well. Alok
