Rob wrote: > Jan, > >>> Did I do something wrong? >> I don't think you did anything wrong - I have tried and >> encountered the same behavior - the installation failed >> on NVDAgraphics package - including IPS guys, who might shed >> some light on this. > > I was trying to install build 111 (not 111a) on an M3000 and the install > completed. > > Here is more info from the M3000: > > root at opensolaris:~# pkg list -v entire SUNWcs SUNWipkg > FMRI STATE > UFIX > pkg:/SUNWcs at 0.5.11,5.11-0.111:20090418T184030Z installed > ---- > pkg:/SUNWipkg at 0.5.11,5.11-0.111:20090418T191553Z installed > ---- > pkg:/entire at 0.5.11,5.11-0.111:20090331T092149Z installed > u---
I don't believe so, your version of entire should be: entire at 0.5.11,5.11-0.111:20090418T200225Z > Based on the contents of /etc/release and pkg data above, is it fair to say > the host is running build 111a? What does uname -a say, and what is the contents of /etc/release. Cheers, -- Shawn Walker
