Danek Duvall wrote: > On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 11:22:10AM -0500, Shawn Walker wrote: > >> Jan Damborsky wrote: >>> Yes - the goal here is to install build 111 from IPS repo which >>> contains 111 and 111a - is there any way how it might be >>> accomplished ? >> Yes, specify the *full* fmri of the "entire" package (including the >> timestamp) to constrain the install appropriately. > > It's really not going to make much of a difference. The entire > incorporations for build 111 and for build 111a are almost identical, > both constraining packages to "@...-0.111". In order to make 111 > installable, we would have had to publish 111a as something other than > 0.111 -- 0.111.1 or 0.111.0.1 or something. >
Ah, good point, I hadn't noticed that when I gave earlier advice in this thread. Seems like we need to adjust the publishing process going forward so that we'll be able to get back to each respin if needed. Dave
