Susan Sohn wrote:
> Hi Ethan,
>
> It looks ok, but I'd suggest the following wording change:
>
> Due to dependency issues, SUNWcsd and SUNWcs
> must be listed first in the package list,
> after entire, and SUNWcsd must precede SUNWcs
>
> ->
>
> Due to dependency issues, entire must be listed first
> in the package list, followed by SUNWcsd, and then SUNWcs.
Sounds fine to me. I'll accept.
In addition, I'll add a follow on line to clarify:
Due to dependency issues, entire must be listed first in
the package list, followed by SUNWcsd, and then SUNWcs.
Any additional packages must be listed after SUNWcs.
(Alok, does that sound okay to you?)
thanks,
-ethan
>
> Sue
>
> On 04/30/09 09:15, Ethan Quach wrote:
>> Need reviewers for this fix ....
>>
>> Webrev:
>> ------------
>> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~equach/webrev.8541
>>
>>
>> Defect:
>> -----------
>> http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=8541
>>
>>
>> Tested new manifest by using it as a base for customizations, and
>> adding it to an install service. Installed a client with it,
>> verifying that
>> client did use that manifest.
>>
>>
>> thanks,
>> -ethan
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> caiman-discuss mailing list
>> caiman-discuss at opensolaris.org
>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss
>
