On Thu, 30 Apr 2009, Ethan Quach wrote: > > > Susan Sohn wrote: >> Hi Ethan, >> >> It looks ok, but I'd suggest the following wording change: >> >> Due to dependency issues, SUNWcsd and SUNWcs >> must be listed first in the package list, >> after entire, and SUNWcsd must precede SUNWcs >> >> -> >> >> Due to dependency issues, entire must be listed first >> in the package list, followed by SUNWcsd, and then SUNWcs. > > Sounds fine to me. I'll accept. > In addition, I'll add a follow on line to clarify: > > Due to dependency issues, entire must be listed first in > the package list, followed by SUNWcsd, and then SUNWcs. > Any additional packages must be listed after SUNWcs. > > > (Alok, does that sound okay to you?)
That works for me. Alok
