On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 09:24 +0200, Jan Damborsky wrote:
> Hi Alex,
> 
> looking at the code changes, I am not sure if we could just replace
> td_umount_and_delete_swap() with td_umount_all().
> The reason is that there might be swap device added by previous
> call to td_mount_and_add_swap() which we want to release once
> we are done there.
> 
> Going through the code, I can see that as far as dealing with regular
> filesystems is concerned, TD keeps track of 'mounting' operations
> carried out in linked list 'umount_head' (see td_mountall.c).
> 
> When cleaning up is to be done, td_umount_all() walks through the
> list and unmounts only filesystems recorded in that list.
> 
> The same mechanism exists for 'swap' - TD keeps track of added swap
> devices in 'unswap_head' linked list.
> 
> However, it seems that when 'swap' devices are to be released,
> td_unswap_all() ignores that list and removes all swap devices
> available. I think that instead it should walk through the 'unswap_head'
> list and release only those swap devices which were recorded there.
> 
> As far as testing procedures are concerned, these changes are in code
> which takes care of discovery of existing Solaris instances installed
> on UFS filesystem (e.g. Solaris 10).
> Target Discovery goes through existing slices, mounts them and tries to
> find Solaris instance on them. Please see following document for more 
> details:
> 
> http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/caiman/files/dwarf_td_design.pdf
> 
> Based on this, I might recommend following testing procedure:
> 
> [1] Install Solaris on UFS - e.g. you could install SXCE release 
> obtained from
> http://www.opensolaris.org/os/downloads/
> 
> [2] Create at least one non-global zone
> 
> [3] Boot LiveCD environment, create swap device on one of free slices
>     and run tdmgtst test driver - verify that
> 
> * it finds and reports UFS Solaris instance
> * things are cleaned up correctly after discovery, i.e.
>   - no new mountpoints appeared
>   - nothing disappeared (swap device)
> 
> Thank you,
> Jan
> 
Thanks Jan, going to test this..
-- 

::alhazred

Reply via email to