Apologies Jan for this outburst, it's not your fault that you did this - you were only doing your job.
This is the first time I've used bugzilla and I was unfamiliar with how the various fields are used in it - we seem to be missing a lot of flexibility that bugster has internally, for example the ability to seperate the severity of a bug to a customer from whether or not it is a "stopper". My setting the bug to that caused it to mean something entirely different to the project team than I desired but nor did I realise that there is no way for it to reflect its importance to me. Cheers, Darren Darren Reed wrote: > Sorry Jan, you do not get to say this is not a blocker. > > For me, this bug is a blocker, not an "enhancement." > > To mark it as an enhancement is to completely misunderstand the way > customer reporting of bugs is supposed to hapen. You are not in a > position to comment on the severity of the bug to me, only *I* am. You > are not the "customer" impacted by the bug, *I* am. > > While you may disagree with other aspects of the bug, you DO NOT get > to disagree with the SEVERITY of the bug TO ME. > > Do you understand that? > > bugzilla at defect.opensolaris.org wrote: >> http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=14194 >> >> >> Jan Damborsky <jan.damborsky at sun.com> changed: >> >> What |Removed |Added >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Status|NEW |CLOSED >> CC| |jan.damborsky at sun.com >> Resolution| |DUPLICATE >> Target Milestone|--- |future >> Severity|blocker |enhancement >> >> >> --- Comment #1 from Jan Damborsky <jan.damborsky at sun.com> 2010-01-27 >> 12:32:12 UTC --- >> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 9152 *** >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > caiman-discuss mailing list > caiman-discuss at opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss
