On 02/ 5/10 10:44 AM, Dave Miner wrote: > On 02/ 5/10 12:09 PM, Keith Mitchell wrote: > ... >> In summary, I would like to propose fixing 9698 using the first solution >> above (http://cr.opensolaris.org/~kemitche/9698_b/), opening another bug >> against this ICT to explore the need for finer grained control over when >> we can or cannot set the keyboard layout, and let the remaining issues >> get captured by the fix to bug 14247. >> > > I don't think your proposed solution is biased in the right direction. > The install is still reported as failing, and that will continue to > generate noise on mailing lists, additional bugs that will be > duplicates, etc. Keyboard layout settings don't matter at all for the > tip line systems - that mapping is done on the client system, so having > failures occurring in those cases is really a poor result. > > I'd suggest that the failure is perhaps logged, but otherwise ignored. > We can then release note the log message and the cases that we know > leave the keyboard layout unset.
I agree with this. At this point we cannot really fix the real issues and logging the message and continuing on seems like the most reasonable way to go. sarah **** > > Dave > _______________________________________________ > caiman-discuss mailing list > caiman-discuss at opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss
