On 02/ 5/10 01:33 PM, Keith Mitchell wrote: > > > On 02/ 5/10 09:44 AM, Dave Miner wrote: >> On 02/ 5/10 12:09 PM, Keith Mitchell wrote: >> ... >>> In summary, I would like to propose fixing 9698 using the first solution >>> above (http://cr.opensolaris.org/~kemitche/9698_b/), opening another bug >>> against this ICT to explore the need for finer grained control over when >>> we can or cannot set the keyboard layout, and let the remaining issues >>> get captured by the fix to bug 14247. >>> >> >> I don't think your proposed solution is biased in the right direction. >> The install is still reported as failing, and that will continue to >> generate noise on mailing lists, additional bugs that will be >> duplicates, etc. Keyboard layout settings don't matter at all for the >> tip line systems - that mapping is done on the client system, so >> having failures occurring in those cases is really a poor result. >> >> I'd suggest that the failure is perhaps logged, but otherwise ignored. >> We can then release note the log message and the cases that we know >> leave the keyboard layout unset. >> >> Dave > > In that case, how do you feel about my originally proposed solution: > http://cr.opensolaris.org/~kemitche/9698_a/ >
I'm OK with it. Dave
