On 18/03/2010 10:42, Jan Damborsky wrote: > Hi everyone, > > please review design specification v0.1 for System Configuration > SMF Service [2]. > > Please provide your comments/feedback before COB Wednesday 3/24. > > Darren, Gary, since it seems there might be a security aspect > of this proposal (see Chapter 10 of design spec), I thought > you might provide us with valuable feedback which would help > us to assure that we don't miss anything important as well as > that we are not unreasonably paranoid. > If you happen to have cycles to take a quick look, it would > be greatly appreciated.
Looks reasonable to me. I think you have done the due dilegence necessary to protect the hashed password while taking advantage of SMF and early manifest import. -- Darren J Moffat
