So, this says that the range is between a couple of tenth's of a second (0.14-0.16s) for py and half to one second (0.58 - 1s) for cgi.
This is the AutoInstall web server. Presumably, installs are relatively infrequent and take a relatively long time to complete. In that context, it seems unlikely that the performance of the web server will dominate the total performance footprint of the entire use-case. Does a half second or a second improvement here really matter? Is a the cgi-vs-py response time difference meaningful when looking at the total time used by- *and* the frequency of invocation of- the entire AI sequence? [*] The derivative question in my mind is whether this is a premature optimization and whether the added complexity of the web infrastructure and development environment is worth the fraction of a second improvement. -John [*] I don't have a clear understanding of the expected AI webserver usage - will an "average install" hit the web server millions of times - or only dozens? Obviously the answer will dictate the weighting applied to this analysis... On 04/ 9/10 02:23 PM, John Fischer wrote: > >> Dave, >> >> apache/mod_wsgi/cherrypy 1, 100, 1000 >> real 0m0.152s >> real 0m14.515s >> real 2m34.528s >> >> apache/cgi-bin 1, 100, 1000 >> real 0m1.065s >> real 0m57.964s >> real 9m30.514s >> >>
_______________________________________________ caiman-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss
