On 04/10/10 12:26 AM, John Fischer wrote:
John,
That is pretty much the same conclusion that I came to as well
which is why Dave asked. The timing is actually at least twice
that because of the way that the manifest is sent to the client
which makes the timing more like 1/3 of a second for Apache/CherryPy
verses little over a second for Apache/cgi-bin. But when one
considers that an install will take several order magnitude longer
then this difference plus only being done once that performance
hit is insignificant. Coupled with the fact that using Apache/cgi-bin
will be less complex and we can improve on the client/server
handshake I think that the design needs to be re-worked.
Expect a new draft next week based on these findings.
Yes, but the other thing you might want to check is memory usage
difference * number of clients.
For example, for the cgi-bin case, if you're serving requests from 30
clients (who all make a request at the same time), how much does each
cgi-bin request use vs. 30 requests to a wsgi setup?
I imagine the cgi-bin approach will use more.
In AI's case, the difference may be negligible since most of the memory
cost will be in the interpreter.
-Shawn
_______________________________________________
caiman-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss
