On 05/10/10 10:17 AM, Sarah Jelinek wrote:
I thought part of this proposal was to deprecate the use of this file.
As Erik points out it is documented today in nodename(4), and has been
around a really long time. I would think that we would file an ARC case
to EOL this interface along with this proposal. If we are keeping it
around, I think the read-only option is a good choice. but, I think even
if we do this, EOL'ing this as a writeable interface needs to be done.


I'm not sure how any proposal to make this read-only would work, since any scripts that wrote here in the past are privileged and would just blow right through mode bits.

Dave


thanks,
sarah
*****

On 05/10/10 06:21 AM, John Fischer wrote:
Erik,

Thanks!! You are not the first one to ask about /etc/nodename
and scripts. I think that we should probably kept it around in
some form too.

Thanks,

John

On 05/10/10 05:08 AM, Erik Nordmark wrote:
On 05/ 6/10 03:17 PM, John Fischer wrote:
All,

Attached is the first revision of the System Configuration SMF service
nodename
design document.

Comments/Questions welcomed.

We currently document the existence of /etc/nodename in nodename(4).

Thus it wouldn't be unreasonable for a customer to have developed
scripts which write the nodename to /etc/nodename instead of using
uname -S.

What happens if such scripts are run in the new world?

Would it be helpful to provide a read-only /etc/nodename which
contains just a comment along the lines of:
# This file has been obsoleted. Use uname(1m) to set and get the
nodename

That way such a script would at least fail, instead of silently
continuing without updating the nodename.

Erik

_______________________________________________
caiman-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss

_______________________________________________
caiman-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss

_______________________________________________
caiman-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss

Reply via email to