Hi Dave,

thank you very much for your comments.
Please see my response in line.

Jan


On 07/26/10 05:35 PM, Dave Miner wrote:
On 07/26/10 09:26 AM, Jan Damborsky wrote:
Hi Ethan,

could I please ask you for reviewing the changes for following bugs ?

7850 RFE would like support for static network instead of nwam config
10781 RFE - AI Needs to Support DNS Name Service Configuration for Clients

webrev:

Related ON CRs:
6923163 Automated Install requires mechanism for configuring static IP
addresses
6923168 Automated Install requires a mechanism for configuring name
services for clients

The install portion of changes is merely about enhancing default
AI manifest (SC portion) with template specifying configuration
of new smf services allowing configuration of static IP and DNS.


I'm a little leery of the default values you've used in the addresses here, because they're almost certainly invalid.

To be honest, I am not quite sure where the problem is -
could you please be more specific about what should be changed ?

I have tried to validate SC portion of default AI manifest using 'svccfg apply -n'
on build 144 (since this is where support for new smf types net_address,
net_address_list was introduced) and it succeeded.

Would it make more sense to use invalid values so that this default configuration can't actually be applied?

I am a little bit confused - do you suggest to use invalid values in default manifest ? I assume we want the opposite, otherwise the installation would fail at the end
during syntactic validation of smf profile.


The other issue is that I think the default shouldn't specify both domain and search for DNS, as the search always overrides the domain and is generally preferred, anyway, because it's more flexible. I'd also suggest using "example.com" as that's the documentation-only domain standard.

Thank you for pointing this out. I have modified the webrev
accordingly:

http://cr.opensolaris.org/~dambi/bug-7850-cr/

_______________________________________________
caiman-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss

Reply via email to