Hi Ethan, On 08/ 3/10 04:13 AM, Ethan Quach wrote: > Hey Darren, > > During the derived manifest review, we steered toward implementing a > separate module for handling DOM access of the manifest content given > the level of the read/write access that was needed. In light of your > proposal here, would it make sense to revisit the DOC for that usage as > well? From a high level, whats missing would be interfaces for write > access; the proposed searching mechanisms using the paths seem more than > adequate.
No, I don't think this would be a another change in direction for the derived manifest. Primarily since the derived manifest work is focused on the XML manifest, and as such, any references to paths here should be all XML based - since that's what's being modified/amended. I think that the derived manifest is still on course :) Thanks, Darren. _______________________________________________ caiman-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss
