On 08/03/10 00:50, Darren Kenny wrote:
Hi Ethan,
On 08/ 3/10 04:13 AM, Ethan Quach wrote:
Hey Darren,
During the derived manifest review, we steered toward implementing a
separate module for handling DOM access of the manifest content given
the level of the read/write access that was needed. In light of your
proposal here, would it make sense to revisit the DOC for that usage as
well? From a high level, whats missing would be interfaces for write
access; the proposed searching mechanisms using the paths seem more than
adequate.
No, I don't think this would be a another change in direction for the derived
manifest.
Primarily since the derived manifest work is focused on the XML manifest, and as
such, any references to paths here should be all XML based - since that's what's
being modified/amended.
Ah okay. I was mistaken then. I thought the "paths" you mentioned
in your proposal were the XML, rather than paths to dataobjects.
thanks,
-ethan
I think that the derived manifest is still on course :)
Thanks,
Darren.
_______________________________________________
caiman-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss
