Darren,
On 01/25/11 14:32, Darren Kenny wrote:
Did I miss something?
Yes! Previously, Drew has specified in_zpool and in_vdev
as attributes of <disk_name>. Now he is changing them to
be attribs of <disk>.
This change seems fine to me.
- Dermot
On 01/25/11 14:32, Darren Kenny wrote:
Hi Drew,
On 25/01/2011 14:26, Drew Fisher wrote:
Darren and Dermot,
I'm perfectly fine with removing the extended_partition entry based on
what you guys said. I didn't realize (and will add a much needed
comment to the DTD file explaining) the convention of 1-4 being primary
and 5-36 being logical.
Ok, thanks.
Are both of you ok with moving the in_zpool/in_vdev attribute up to the
<disk> level?
I'm not sure what you mean by this last part...
AFAIR, in_zpool/in_vdev should be on a Disk, Partition or Slice.
OK, it's not valid in certain circumstances (e.g. a partition that is an
extended partition), but that's down to validation.
Did I miss something?
Thanks,
Darren.
_______________________________________________
caiman-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss
