Keith - Your email came through. I guess it's just oracle postbee (bee 
postmaster) who likes to give you misleading information.. I got several 
delivery failure message myself and managed to annoy several people with 
resend.. but it's always good to be safe than sorry I guess.. ;-)

Martin

On 3/1/2011 11:16 AM, Keith Mitchell wrote:
[Another delivery failure, 3rd time's a charm...]

On 03/ 1/11 11:06 AM, Keith Mitchell wrote:
Trying again...

On 03/ 1/11 11:03 AM, Keith Mitchell wrote:
On 03/ 1/11 10:11 AM, Martin Widjaja wrote:
Sue - In reviewing this quickly, it looks good overall, but I have several 
questions, mostly to satisfy my own curiosity:

I know you asked Sue, but I have some answers to chime in with here.


- Makefile: would it be worth keeping the generic rules for building .c, etc.? 
Maybe this can be useful for other things later on?
- installadm.py: 354: is there a reason to remove the traceback limit here? Is 
this going to be too much if everything is printed?

If we reach a point where we're printing a traceback, we're already in a 
scenario where the user encountered a bug. More information is better than 
less, in that case (and the limit=2 almost always cut out the useful portion of 
the traceback, since it cuts out the 'bottom' of the stack).

- installadm_common.py: 95-105: is this ksh execution to determine multi-home 
going to persist or is there a better way to gather this information using 
either python lib or C lib? I am personally not a fan of command line output 
parsing.

I was thinking of swapping that out with ISIM, though it may be quick to change 
as part of this push. The concern I have with doing it *right* now is it would 
be easy to miss edge cases - by porting this right across from the .c 
implementation, we're at least not introducing any new bugs.

- libaiscf.py: 105: what's wrong with previous implementation?

The old version was simply broken - there was an extraneous "self" argument. 
Any attempt to call that function resulted in a traceback.


Thanks,
Martin

PS. test_ai_smf_service.py: can't get more optimistic than wobbly knees and 
failing eyesight..


On 2/28/2011 11:44 AM, Sue Sohn wrote:
Please do a code review of the changes for:

7020631  Convert create-service.c to python
http://monaco.sfbay.sun.com/detail.jsf?cr=7020631

Webrev:
http://cr.opensolaris.org/~sohn/7020631

Thanks,
Sue
_______________________________________________
caiman-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss
_______________________________________________
caiman-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss



_______________________________________________
caiman-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss

Reply via email to