OMG !!! seeing doctrine tutorial and the lots of line codes... I love ORM CAKE !!!
On Jul 8, 3:35 pm, stephenrs <[email protected]> wrote: > @anasmughal: thanks for linking to your article - seems like a nice clean > solution, but I'm (like others) wondering how it has worked out for you (?) > Without having thought it through too deeply, I'm wondering what breaks > where core Cake functionality is concerned and what benefits you have > enjoyed. Something just tells me that if it was that simple to integrate a > third party ORM without some sacrifices, it would be a be a no-brainer for > the Cake team..."if it sounds too good to be true, it usually is" ;) > > @mark: no apologies needed. Cake has made things possible that would have > been previously out of reach for a lot of people - self included (I still > remember my feeling of shock when I saw how easy it was to build my first > scaffold app...a true "WTF, how cool is this" moment). Forums are a place to > share ideas, and hopefully the end result is better products, and better, > more sustainable code overall out in the wild...keep up the good work, and > hopefully some of what's coming up in this thread can help advance your > thinking about which areas deserve focus and how to continue to make Cake > better (and thanks for participating in the discussion in the first place). > > I'd certainly be a supporter of decoupling the framework itself from the ORM > layer (while retaining important core Cake goodness) as a roadmap objective > though, and this would seem to be more in line with the spirit of the MVC > pattern, at least perhaps from a purist's perspective...3.0? > > SS -- Our newest site for the community: CakePHP Video Tutorials http://tv.cakephp.org Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://ask.cakephp.org and help others with their CakePHP related questions. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php
